Columns

Pixabay photo
Sauces and breads are among the sneakiest offenders

By David Dunaief, M.D.

Dr. David Dunaief

If you have high blood pressure, you’ve probably been told to reduce your sodium. But what about the rest of us? 

According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, about 90 percent of Americans consume too much sodium. This puts our health at risk — and not just for high blood pressure (1).

What are the effects of too much sodium?

In addition to increasing our risk of high blood pressure (hypertension), with consequences like stroke and heart disease, sodium can affect our kidney function, even without high blood pressure.

The Nurses’ Health Study evaluated kidney function in approximately 3,200 women, assessing estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) as related to sodium intake (2). Over 14 years, those with a daily sodium intake of 2,300 mg had a much greater chance of a 30 percent or more reduction in kidney function when compared to those who consumed 1,700 mg per day.

Kidneys are an important part of our systems for removing toxins and waste. They are also where many hypertension medications work, including ACE inhibitors, ARBs, and diuretics (water pills). If kidney function declines, it can be harder to treat high blood pressure. Worse, it could lead to chronic kidney disease and dialysis. Once someone has reached dialysis, most blood pressure medications are not very effective.

What are sodium recommendations?

Interestingly, the current recommended maximum sodium intake is 2,300 mg per day, or one teaspoon. If you’ve been paying attention, you’ve probably noticed that’s the same level that led to negative effects in the study. However, Americans’ average intake is 3,400 mg a day (1).

If we reduced our consumption by even a modest 20 percent, we could reduce the incidence of heart disease dramatically. Current recommendations from the FDA and the American Heart Association indicate an upper limit of 2,300 mg per day (3, 4). The American Heart Association goes further, suggestion an “ideal” limit of no more than 1,500 mg per day (3).

What are the biggest sodium sources?

More than 70 percent of our sodium intake comes from processed and packaged foods and from restaurants, not the saltshaker. There is nothing wrong with eating out or ordering in on occasion, but you can’t control how much salt goes into your food. Even when you request “no salt,” many items are pre-seasoned, and sauces can contain excessive amounts of sodium.

One approach to reduce your sodium intake is to choose products that have 200 mg or fewer per serving indicated on the label. Foods labeled “low sodium” have fewer than 140 mg of sodium. This is not the same as foods labeled “reduced sodium.” These have 25 percent less than the full-sodium version, which doesn’t mean much. For example, soy sauce has about 1,000 mg of sodium per tablespoon, but low-sodium soy sauce still has about 600 mg per tablespoon.

Salad dressings, sauces and other condiments, where serving sizes are small, add up quickly. Mustard has about 120 mg per teaspoon. Most of us use more than one teaspoon. Make sure to read the labels on all packaged foods and sauces very carefully, checking for sodium and for serving size. In restaurants, ask for sauces on the side and use them sparingly, if at all.

Bread products are another hidden source. Most contain a decent amount of sodium. I have seen a single slice of whole wheat bread include up to 200 mg. of sodium. That’s one slice. Make a sandwich with four ounces of lower sodium deli meat and mustard, and you could easily consume 1240 mg in a single sandwich.

Soups and canned goods are notoriously high in sodium. There are a few on the market that have no sodium. Look for these and add your own seasonings. Restaurant soups are a definite “no.”

Become an avid label reader. Sodium hides in all kinds of foods that don’t necessarily taste salty, such as cheeses, sweet sauces and salad dressings. Put all sauces and dressings on the side, so you can control how much — if any — you choose to use.

Is sea salt better than table salt?

Are sea salts better for you than table salt? Not really. They can have a slightly lower level of sodium, but that’s because their crystal shape means fewer granules fit in a teaspoon. I recommend not using either. In addition to causing health issues, salt dampens your taste buds, masking other flavors.

As you reduce your sodium intake, you might be surprised at how quickly your taste buds adjust. In just a few weeks, foods you previously thought didn’t taste salty will seem overwhelmingly so, and you will notice new flavors in unsalted foods.

When seasoning your food at home, use salt-free seasonings, like Trader Joe’s 21 Seasoning Salute or, if you prefer a salty taste, consider a salt substitute, like Benson’s Table Tasty.

References:

(1) cdc.gov. (2) Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2010;5:836-843. (3) heart.org. (4) fda.gov.

Dr. David Dunaief is a speaker, author and local lifestyle medicine physician focusing on the integration of medicine, nutrition, fitness and stress management. For further information, visit www.medicalcompassmd.com or consult your personal physician.

Fresh Tomato Bruschetta Chicken

By Heidi Sutton

Homemade bruschetta comes together in no time if you have the key ingredients — high quality balsamic vinegar, sun-ripened tomatoes, and fresh basil. 

Take this delicious appetizer one step further by turning it into a  delicious and hearty meal with a bruschetta chicken bake. 

Fresh Tomato Bruschetta

Fresh Tomato Bruschetta

YIELD: Makes 4 servings

INGREDIENTS: 

1 pound tomatoes, diced

1⁄2 cup packed fresh basil leaves, minced

5 tablespoons extra virgin olive oil, divided

2 large cloves garlic, minced

1⁄4 teaspoon salt

1⁄8 teaspoon black pepper

16 slices Italian bread

DIRECTIONS:

Combine fresh tomatoes, basil, 3 tablespoons oil, garlic, salt, and pepper in a large bowl; mix well. Let stand at room temperature 1 hour to blend flavors. Preheat oven to 375 F. Place bread on baking sheet. Brush remaining oil over one side of each bread slice. Bake 6 to 8 minutes, or until toasted. Top with tomato mixture.

Fresh Tomato Bruschetta Chicken

Fresh Tomato Bruschetta Chicken

YIELD: Makes 6 servings

INGREDIENTS: 

1/3 cup extra-virgin olive oil

3 tablespoons finely chopped fresh basil, plus additional, for garnish

3 cloves garlic, minced

1 teaspoon salt

1/2 teaspoon ground black pepper

1/2 teaspoon dried oregano

6 thinly sliced boneless, skinless chicken breast cutlets (about 1 1/2 pounds)

1 large onion, thinly sliced

1 large jar marinara sauce

2 cups multi-colored grape tomatoes, halved

2  stems cherry tomatoes on the vine

1/2 cup shredded Parmesan cheese

2  tablespoons balsamic glaze

DIRECTIONS:

Preheat oven to 400 F. In small bowl, whisk olive oil, basil, garlic, salt, pepper and oregano until combined. Combine 2 tablespoons oil mixture and chicken in resealable plastic bag. Let stand 5-10 minutes at room temperature to marinate.

In medium skillet, heat 2 tablespoons oil mixture over medium heat. Add onions; cook 3-4 minutes, or until crisp-tender. Stir in marinara sauce. Pour mixture into lightly greased 13-by-9-inch baking dish. Arrange chicken breasts in dish, overlapping if necessary. Top with grape tomatoes and cherry tomato stems. Spoon remaining oil mixture over tomatoes.

Bake, covered, 25 minutes, or until chicken is done (165 F) and tomatoes start to burst. Sprinkle with Parmesan, drizzle with balsamic glaze and garnish with fresh basil leaves before serving.

METRO photo

By A. Craig Purcell, Esq.

A. Craig Purcell, Esq.

Historically, the news predominantly focused on driving while impaired by the consumption of alcohol. However, driving while a person’s ability to do so is impaired by drugs, including marijuana, is equally dangerous and critical. This is especially so in light of marijuana being legalized for recreational use in New York. This month we will delve into the distinctions between driving while ability impaired by alcohol and drugs, specifically marijuana, under New York State law.

We all know that it is illegal to drive a vehicle while your ability to do so is impaired by drugs, including marijuana, as stated in the Vehicle and Traffic Law (VTL) § 1192(4). Even for a first-time offense, the penalties for violating this law can be severe.

Below is a helpful comparison of the penalties for driving while impaired by alcohol versus drugs.

It should be noted that a significant difference between these two offenses is the severity of the above consequences. A DWAI by marijuana conviction results in a criminal record from the first offense, whereas a first-time DWAI by alcohol does not. However, proving impairment due to marijuana can be more complex. Unlike alcohol, where Blood Alcohol Content (BAC) levels provide a straightforward measure of impairment, the presence of drugs like marijuana does not necessarily indicate impairment. The prosecution must demonstrate that the driver’s ability to operate the vehicle was actually impaired. However, there is a movement underfoot to lower the legal BAC limit, which would seriously affect the enforcement, prosecution, and defense of Driving While Intoxicated (DWI) cases. More will be written about this in future articles.

Currently, there is not a universally accepted test equivalent to the breathalyzer for marijuana. This makes it more challenging for prosecutors to prove impairment beyond a reasonable doubt. Therefore, individuals charged with DWAI by drugs may have a stronger defense so long as they are prepared to challenge the prosecution’s evidence, including the legitimacy of the traffic stop.

However, let us remind you that while both substances can impair driving abilities, it is crucial to remember that smoking marijuana or drinking alcohol before driving isn’t illegal per se—impairment is the key factor. The law requires proof of impairment, not just consumption. As laws evolve, especially with the increasing legalization of marijuana, understanding these nuances becomes even more critical. If you’re facing charges related to impaired driving, it’s advisable to seek experienced legal counsel to navigate the complexities of the law.

A. Craig Purcell, Esq. is a partner at the law firm of Glynn Mercep Purcell and Morrison LLP in Setauket and is a former President of the Suffolk County Bar Association and Vice President of the New York State Bar Association

Jesús Pérez Ríos at the New York Public Library in 2023. Photo by Anne Martinez Hoth

By Daniel Dunaief

When he’s looking to relax, he builds and rebuilds some of the LEGO sets in his house in East Setauket. One of the things he likes best about being on Long Island, where he’s lived for the last two years, is that he can be alone to think and develop new ideas.

To hear Jesús Pérez Ríos describe himself, he is “just a kid having fun.” An Assistant Professor in the Department of Physics and Astronomy at Stony Brook University, Pérez Ríos enjoys bridging scientific knowledge, applying his physics background to questions, problems and puzzles in other fields.

Recently, the Stony Brook physicist, who is also an affiliated faculty member at the Institute for Advanced Computational Sciences, collaborated with Stefan Willitsch, Professor in the Department of Chemistry at the University of Basel in Switzerland, to explore the forces that might be inhibiting the reaction between hydroquinone and neon.

In a paper published in the journal Nature Chemistry, Pérez Ríos, Willitsch and members of their teams described in detail several potentially opposing forces that affect the reactivity in the experiment.

Jesús Pérez Ríos at the Barnes and Noble in New York City in 2022 with Lego batman. Photo by Anne Martinez Hoth

“I started collaborating with [Willitsch] because he had accurate results, and it was hard to explain the observations,” said Pérez Ríos. “We had a hypothesis but needed to develop models to test it.”

Pérez Ríos described two interactions in detail. One is due to the long range atom-molecule interactions and the other comes from internal rotational dynamics.

With the experiments in Willitsch’s lab and the theory developed by Pérez Ríos and his colleagues, they highlighted the role of rotational quantum states in a hydroquinone-neon chemi-ionization reaction. A similar mechanism and approach may be suitable for other reactions as well, such as molecular ion-atom reactions.

These molecules are akin to puzzle pieces coming together. Instead of a two-dimensional alignment where pieces find each other and lock together in their complementary parts, these pieces also have rotational effects that can cause a misalignment.

“That is one of our key findings,” Pérez Ríos explained. “It is like the shape of the puzzle piece evolves depending on the molecule’s collision energy and internal state.”

The results presented in the scientific paper are in the realm of fundamental research, with no “immediate practical application in synthesis or catalysis,” explained Willitsch.

Nonetheless, the insights gained through this collaboration “leads to a better understanding of the relevant reaction mechanisms and thus enables a more efficient design of future chemical reactions.”

At this point, Willitsch has presented the work at several conferences, where he has found a receptive audience and expects it will “foreseeably stimulate further work in the field.”

A search for answers

Pérez Ríos explained that Willitsch had some possible explanations for his data, but he did not have a mathematical model to test his hypothesis.

Jesus Pérez Ríos in Port Jefferson in 2022. Photo by Anne Martinez Hoth

“He mentioned the experimental details to me and we discussed the data,” said Pérez Ríos, who has known Willitsch for about 12 years. “Then, we started to do calculations from our side.”

Pérez Ríos has a team of 7 PhD students, one postdoctoral researcher, one Master’s candidate and three undergraduates.

Members of his lab work on simulations of physical phenomena regarding atomic and molecular processes. Additionally, they work on machine learning applications to atomic and molecular physics, exploring ways to teach a machine classical mechanics or quantum mechanics through chemical reactions.

In the reaction he was studying, Willitsch was working with hydroquinone, which has two conformers. These are two molecules with the same chemical formula that have two different structures.

Willitsch was able to select for a particular type of conformer in its reaction with neon.

Pérez Ríos considered many possibilities and models, none of which was fully satisfactory. 

An insight at a conference

When he was at an Air Force Office of Scientific Research review program in Washington DC, Pérez Ríos was considering the problem from numerous perspectives.

He had tried many possibilities, but none were convincing. He needed something new.

“I had the physical picture of the model during a conference: in a break, I started to work on the code, and, in a few hours, I had something ready to get some very preliminary results,” Pérez Ríos recalled.

Willitsch enthusiastically embraced the preliminary results and the group decided to make it more realistic, developing the version of the code to explain Willitsch’s data.

The dynamics simulations were ready in a month, with extra checks conducted for another month to ensure everything was correct. The joint effort took over a year and a half to produce a fulfilling explanation.

Many of Pérez Ríos’s collaborators come from different disciplines, which gives the Stony Brook Assistant Professor an opportunity to learn about a variety of topics. He has worked with particle, atmospheric, atomic and plasma physicists and spectroscopists and chemists.

Pérez Ríos suggested that a physics perspective can help in a variety of settings, even including household problems and daily challenges.

Echoing a theme from the main character Jason Nesmith (played by Tim Allen) in the movie Galaxy Quest, Pérez Ríos said, “you can never surrender.”

 Pérez Ríos added that you “are the only one putting limits on yourself. However, you need to pick the battles worth fighting, which is a very difficult matter.”

More American than Americans

A resident of East Setauket where he lives with his wife Anne Martinez Hoth, Pérez Ríos grew up in Guardamar del Segura, a small town in Alicante, Spain.

The son of restaurant owners,  Pérez Ríos said he didn’t travel during summers to the beach, the way many of his friends did.

When he wasn’t helping in the restaurant, he used his free time to learn about math, zoology, genetics, chemistry and physics.

He enjoys living on Long Island and in the United States. His wife suggests he is “more American than the Americans” because he likes the American job philosophy and the freedom.

At Stony Brook, Pérez Ríos teaches quantum mechanics to undergrads, some of whom say he is strict.

“I have a very particular approach focusing on learning to think rather than knowing how to solve a problem,” he said.

As a research partner, Pérez Ríos is an unusual find, bringing constructive and valuable insights to discussions.

“I have rarely collaborated with someone so energetic and broadly interested” as Pérez Ríos, Willitsch said. “I particularly value his pragmatic approach and that he is not afraid to leave his comfort zone to delve into totally new classes of problems, which have not been tackled before either by himself or others.”

Willitsch added that few scientists have the same broad knowledge of physics and chemistry, which is “vital to push this interdisciplinary frontier.”

File photo by Raymond Janis

Poor choice of word

The word “divisive” in the headline of your article regarding the “In Trump We Trust” banner in Port Jefferson (TBR News Media, Aug. 1) is misleading. It infers that the banner indicates former — and, hopefully, future — President Donald Trump (R) is “divisive.” I’m sure that the papers wouldn’t have used the word “divisive” in the headline had the banner stated the name of the actual divider-in-chief currently occupying the White House.

Art Billadello

East Setauket

Gratitude not complaints

Jen Schaedel’s long, angry letter (“Unjustified dismantlement of West Meadow Beach cottages,” (TBR News Media, Aug. 1) is a classic case of the aphorism, “When you’re used to privilege, equality feels unjust.”

Whether the nearly-free early-1900s waterfront property leases were favors for the politically connected, or just gross municipal malpractice, giving away perpetually renewable rights to valuable public property for private use was always a violation of basic American principles.

Good-faith debates could be had over the proper fate of the buildings. But, the idea that leaseholders deserved to renew the leases forever was always morally indefensible, regardless of how wholesome the community was. So it is shocking to see anyone still defend it, let alone portray themselves as victims.

Rather than complain about public officials reclaiming public property for public use, all the people lucky enough to have been associated with the cottage community over the years should, instead, be quietly grateful for the decades of cheap, exclusive use of land they didn’t own.

John Hover

East Setauket

Brother, can you spare the MTA $15 billion

Port Jefferson Branch LIRR riders should be concerned that MTA Chairman and CEO Janno Lieber said he will take Gov. Kathy Hochul (D) at her word — when she promised to restore the $15 billion she cut from the transit agency’s $51 billion 2020-2024 Five Year Capital Plan due to her pause of congestion pricing — is wishful thinking on his part.

Hochul continues to not provide the financial source for her $15 billion. She has kicked the can down the road until the next state budget is adopted — nine months from now.

In 2019, Gov. Andrew Cuomo (D) and the state Legislature, instead of providing hard cash, gave the MTA congestion pricing. This was supposed to raise $15 billion toward the MTA 2020-2024 capital plan. Albany’s financial watchdog, State Comptroller Tom DiNapoli (D), said nothing. With real cash, virtually all of these state-of-good-repair projects would have already been under way.

Hochul claims she can find additional state and federal funding to make up for the missing $15 billion in congestion pricing. The MTA will receive $1.8 billion in annual formula grants supplemented by competitive discretionary grant program allocations from the Federal Transit Administration in federal fiscal year 2024 (Oct. 1, 2023-Sept. 30, 2024).

Other than these resources, there are no other FTA pots of gold to cover the missing $15 billion previously accounted for from congestion pricing.

Clearly Hochul and her staff, who advise her and ghost write her speeches, have little understanding of how Washington funding for the MTA works. When it comes to MTA financing, Hochul reminds me of the old cartoon character Wimpy. He was fond of saying, “I’ll gladly pay you on Tuesday for a hamburger today” — or in this case $15 billion worth of MTA capital transportation projects tomorrow.

Larry Penner

Great Neck

WRITE TO US … AND KEEP IT LOCAL 

We welcome your letters, especially those responding to our local coverage, replying to other letter writers’ comments and speaking mainly to local themes. Letters should be no longer than 400 words and may be edited for length, libel, style, good taste and uncivil language. They will also be published on our website. We do not publish anonymous letters. Please include an address and phone number for confirmation. Email letters to: [email protected] or mail them to TBR News Media, P.O. Box 707, Setauket, NY 11733

 

Father Gerald Fitzsimmons

By Fr. Francis Pizzarelli

Fr. Francis Pizzarelli

Our community has been blessed with so many extraordinary people who by the power of their example have inspired many of us to stay the course and continue to build bridges and not walls.

One of those powerful bridge builders who touched so many of us died on July 19 of ALS, Lou Gehrig’s disease, at the age of 76. Father Gerald Fitzsimmons, known to most of us as Fr. Fitz was a powerful preacher and teacher. 

In 1974, Fr. Fitz came as an ordained deacon for the Montfort Missionaries and was assigned to Infant Jesus Catholic Church in Port Jefferson Village. In 1975, he was ordained a Roman Catholic priest. He was young and filled with tremendous energy with a powerful voice.

In 1979, another young Montfort Missionary came to Port Jefferson’s Infant Jesus Church to replace him. Yours truly was assigned as a parish priest. Fr. Fitz stayed an extra year. I learned so much from him about ministry, about priesthood and about basketball. We were both fierce competitors.

However, what impressed me most was his compassionate heart and his profound commitment to the most vulnerable and broken among us. After Infant Jesus, he served as the pastor of St. Mary Gate of Heaven church in Ozone Park, Queens. Also, during the years after he left Port Jefferson, he became known throughout the region as an extraordinary preacher and retreat master.

Father Gerald Fitzsimmons

His ministry extended around the world. He became a real agent of compassion and justice for those who were victims of clergy sexual abuse. He became internationally known for his compassionate heart and his wisdom.

Hope House Ministries was founded in 1980. In the 1990s, as we were experiencing a lot of growing pains, he was elected Provincial Superior of the Montfort Missionaries in the United StatesDuring his tenure, he was extremely supportive of my ministry in Port Jefferson and supportive of me personally. He always urged me to stay the course and I have.

Having accompanied a number of people who died from ALS, I have always been amazed with their courage, kindness and wisdom.

During the two years with ALS, Father Fitz never stopped working, preaching and healing. Quickly the disease caused him to be confined to a wheelchair; then he became unable to use only a few fingers. However, he continued to use his powerful voice of compassion through Zoom meetings with the international community and celebrating mass regularly for the Sisters of St. Joseph up until a week before he died. 

His voice and compassionate heart will always be remembered. I am grateful that I got to know him and was able to walk with him on part of his journey. I know I am richer for it.

Father Francis Pizzarelli, SMM, LCSW-R, ACSW, DCSW, is the director of Hope House Ministries in Port Jefferson.

MEET CHESTER

This week’s featured shelter pet is Chester, a sweet 15-year-old black cat up for adoption at the Smithtown Animal Shelter. 

This big boy is a loving lap cat that just wants attention. He lost his home when his human dad became too ill to care for himself. Chester is accustomed to being in/outdoor and will need a new home that can commit to keeping him inside. 

If you are interested in meeting Chester, please fill out an application online to schedule time to properly interact with your prospective soul mate in a domestic setting at www.townofsmithtownanimalshelter.com.

The Town of Smithtown Animal & Adoption Shelter is located at 410 Middle Country Road, Smithtown. Visitor hours are Monday to Saturday from 10 a.m. to 3 p.m. (Sundays and Wednesday evenings by appointment only). For more information, call 631-360-7575.

METRO photo

By Daniel Dunaief

Daniel Dunaief

I’m tired, crabby, angry, annoyed, frustrated, disappointed, appalled and short tempered. 

Sleep, as a feature in TBR News Media this week suggests, will cure some of that.

But I’m just so fed up with the nonstop negativity in the country. Half the country not only wants to win, but seems thrilled with the prospect that the other half will lose. The worse the losers feel, the happier they are.

We’ve become a society of stomping toddlers, eager to crush the careful creations and ideas of those we oppose under our feet. Cut it out! This isn’t helping.

Okay, let’s take a step back from politicians and discuss us, you know, John and Joan Q. Public.

We are generally sleep deprived, according to statistics and people who pinch themselves not out of sheer joy but out of the necessity of staying awake each day.

More than one out of two people in the cars next to us may not only be texting and/or talking on the phone, but is also likely struggling to stay awake. That’s not good for them or for us.

Think about it: when you go to a store for stuff, call a company to send someone to fix your air conditioners in overbearing heat, or need someone to provide a skill set that you don’t possess, you don’t ask a long list of questions to make sure they were on the winning political team or that they believe everything you believe or even that they got enough sleep the previous night.

But, wait, what if the help we need is part of the other political team or, even going outside the realm of politics, is a devoted fan of the Red Sox, believes in red herrings, or is a fan of the color red?

You might privately enjoy the victory of your team or your would-be political leader, but are you really eager for them — you know, the “others” who are a part of our lives — to be miserable?

Their misery could become your misery.

It might tickle you to watch them cry and to ponder the existential threat that the person you support won and the person they supported lost, but you still need them even if you have no use for their political leaders.

If they lose sleep and are worse at their jobs, you might have to wait longer in line, deal with an incorrect bill you have to keep fighting, or suffer through the consequences of getting a meal that contains an allergen you told the waitress you couldn’t eat.

Even if you feel a momentary satisfaction that people who are supporting the wrong candidates  lost, you shouldn’t be too eager to push their head in the mud or to throw tomatoes at them. You might need those people and your tomatoes.

What happened to agreeing to disagree, to the art of compromise or even just to listening?

If whichever side loses feels like they still have a seat at the table, an ability to affect policies, an opportunity to help our children learn — is anyone on this campaign talking about education, ever? — and confidence that someone will listen to their ideas, the political and cultural temperature wouldn’t be so high and we the people would sleep and work better.

Yes, the extremes on each side can be absurd and frustrating, but even those people with the most ridiculous signs can be agreeable and helpful outside the context of political ideology.

So, just to recap, we might want to consider this great experiment in democracy as a team effort. We don’t always say and do the right things and we don’t always back the right horses, but, together, we can be greater than any one election or one would-be leader.

Unless we’re ready to live on a farm and eat our own food, educate our children, provide our own energy and entertainment and perform necessary surgeries on ourselves, we need each other. Once we remember that, we might have a better chance of sleeping well at night, which will make us better at our many roles, from parenting, to working, to contributing to our communities.

By Leah S. Dunaief

Leah Dunaief,
Publisher

If you like spy stories, read on. The riveting part about this one is that it is real. The account jumped off the front page of The New York Times to me on Tuesday and speaks to the state of the world today. The recent large East-West prisoner exchange unearthed this tale that could be a streaming series but is reality.

Slovenia, once part of Yugoslavia, is a small country in central Europe. It is bordered by Austria and Hungary on the north, Croatia on the east, the Italian port city of Trieste on the southwest and  it has coastline along the Gulf of Venice. Although controlled by the Soviet Union for most of post WWII, it is now a member of NATO and the European Union. 

It was there that Russian Anna Dultseva and her husband, Artem Dultsev, set up an online art gallery and passed themselves off as Argentines. He started a bogus high tech business. Using the name Maria Rosa Mayer Munos, she organized frequent trips to Britain and even arranged for art exhibitions in Edinburgh.

Tipped off by intelligence in Britain, the couple was arrested in December 2022 in their comfortable home near the capital, Ljubljana, as they were communicating with Moscow, using special equipment that bypassed phone and internet lines.

Their lives must have been constantly tense for the wife and husband. They had two children, a daughter, now12, a son, now 9, and a small dog. They kept to themselves, spoke to no one, and seldom had visitors, according to neighbors in the suburb. The children attended the nearby British International School, and the family spoke Spanish and English at home. 

Although people sometimes gossiped about them, wondering what they were doing there, they were mostly ignored because they did not cause trouble. Their financial filings might have sparked interest, since they showed little income, yet they lived in a three-story house with a small garden and a wooden fence and sent their children to a school that charged $10,000 per pupil. The art they sold was the kind bought in China for little money.

The authorities are still trying to figure out what the couple was up to since their arrival in 2017, although probably not fully activated until war with Ukraine five years later. Large sums of cash were found in the house, causing speculation that they were paying off a network of sleeper agents and other Russian operations throughout Europe. 

Apparently Russian intelligence has an elaborate network of deep-cover sleeper spies trained to impersonate citizens of other countries by Russia’s foreign intelligence agency, the SVR. This is, apparently, a real life version of a television series called “The Americans,” that was in turn inspired by the arrest in 2010 of a ring of sleeper spies in the United States.

According to NYT reporter, Andrew Higgins, Russia has a long history of fielding such undercover spies “who burrow deep into target countries over many years.” This is something that President Putin has supported since his days in the K.G.B. These “illegal” spies have no diplomatic cover, no obvious connection to Russia, and suffer the consequences on their own if caught.

Whatever the pair did is considered to have been extremely important because, when they were released, were rejoined by their children, and landed in Moscow, they were greeted by a smiling Putin, who addressed the children with the Spanish words, “Buenas noches.” 

They were also greeted by Sergey Naryshkin, the head of the SVR intelligence agency. If unaware of their parents’ real jobs, as the Kremlin asserted, those must have been two very confused children.

A potassium-rich diet may help to reduce blood pressure. Stock photo
Drugs may not be necessary in early stages

By David Dunaief, M.D.

Dr. David Dunaief

High blood pressure affects over 48 percent of U.S. adults (1). This scary number means that almost 50 percent of us are at increased risk for heart attack and stroke, the two most frequent causes of death (2). It also puts us at higher risk for chronic kidney disease and dementia (3).

Hypertension severity is categorized into three stages, or levels of severity, each with a different recommended treatment regimen. When the stages were created in 2017, what we used to call “prehypertension” was split into two new categories: elevated blood pressure and hypertension stage 1.

Elevated blood pressure is defined as systolic blood pressure (the top number) of 120-129 mmHg and diastolic blood pressure (the bottom number) of less than 80 mmHg. Stage 1 includes systolic blood pressure of 130-139 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure of 80-89 mmHg (4). You can find a simple chart of all levels on The American Heart Association’s website: www.heart.org.

Both have significant consequences, even though there are often no symptoms.

In an analysis of the Framingham Heart Study, researchers found that those with prehypertension experienced a 3.5-fold increase in the risk of heart attack and a 1.7-fold increase in the risk of cardiovascular disease (5). Many other studies support these increased risks (6, 7). This is why it’s critical to address increased blood pressure, even in these early stages.

The good news is that new and extended studies have given us clearer insights about effective treatments, stratifying our approaches to improve outcomes.

What’s the best treatment for elevated blood pressure?

The Joint National Commission (JNC) 8, the association responsible for guidelines on the treatment of hypertension, included lifestyle modifications at the top of its recommendations for elevated blood pressure (8).

Lifestyle changes include dietary changes. A Mediterranean-type diet or the DASH (Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension) diet are both good options.

Any diet you select should focus on increasing your intake of fruits and vegetables and reducing your daily sodium consumption to no more than 1500 mg (two-thirds of a teaspoon) (9). You should also ensure you exercise, manage your weight, and consume no more than modest amounts of alcohol (1 or fewer drinks for women and 2 or fewer drinks for men on a daily basis) (8).

Some studies have also shown that a potassium-rich diet helps to reduce blood pressure (9). Fortunately, foods like fruits, vegetables, beans and legumes have significant amounts of potassium. However, do not take potassium supplements unless instructed for other reasons by a physician; high potassium can be very dangerous and can precipitate a heart attack.

Some drugmakers have advocated for using medication to treat elevated blood pressure. The Trial of Preventing Hypertension (TROPHY) suggested the use of a hypotensive agent, the blood pressure drug candesartan to treat prehypertensive patients (10)(11). The drug reduced the incidence of hypertension significantly compared to placebo over two years. However, after stopping therapy, the following two years showed only a small benefit over placebo. The study was funded by Astra-Zeneca, which made Atacand, a brand version of the drug. 

In an editorial, Jay I. Meltze, M.D., a clinical specialist in hypertension at Columbia University’s College of Physicians and Surgeons, noted that the results were interpreted in an unusually favorable way (12). 

Since elevated blood pressure responds well to lifestyle changes, why add medication when there are no long-term benefits? I don’t recommend using medication to treat elevated blood pressure patients, and the JNC8 agrees.

Do lifestyle changes treat Stage 1 hypertension?

For those with Stage 1 hypertension, but with a low 10-year risk of cardiovascular events, these same lifestyle modifications should be implemented for three-to-six months. At this point, a reassessment of risk and blood pressure will determine whether the patient should continue with lifestyle changes or if they need to be treated with medications (13). 

Your physician should assess your risk as part of this equation.

I am encouraged that the role of lifestyle modifications in controlling hypertension has been recognized and is influencing official recommendations. When patients and physicians collaborate on a lifestyle approach that drives improvements, the side effects are only better overall health.

References:

(1) cdc.gov. (2) NCHS Data Brief. 2022;456. (3) Hypertension 2020;75:285-92. (4) heart.org. (5) Stroke 2005; 36: 1859–1863. (6) Hypertension 2006;47:410-414. (7) Am Fam Physician. 2014 Oct 1;90(7):503-504. (8) J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 May, 71 (19) 2176–2198. (9) Arch of Internal Medicine 2001;161:589-593. (10) N Engl J Med. 2006;354:1685-1697. (11) J Am Soc Hypertens. Jan-Feb 2008;2(1):39-43. (12) Am J Hypertens. 2006;19:1098-1100. (13) Hypertension. 2021 Jun;77(6):e58-e67.

Dr. David Dunaief is a speaker, author and local lifestyle medicine physician focusing on the integration of medicine, nutrition, fitness and stress management. For further information, visit www.medicalcompassmd.com or consult your personal physician.